| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The cumulative impact from the loft conversion including the hip to gable roof conversion, the rear dormer window, lack of set back on the first floor side extension and fenestration alignment would unbalance the appearance of this pair of semi-detached properties by reason of its scale, bulk and mass and appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and also within the rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | The rear dormer window would, by reason of its excessive width, bulk and mass, relate unacceptably to the existing dwelling and would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street and rear garden scene. The development would therefore be harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Kakanos by e-mail on 07/02/18. |
