| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed outbuilding, by reason of its size, bulk, mass and projection for of the building line, would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden environment, harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to the Supplementary Planning Document for Residential Extensions and Alterations and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposal, by reason of the combined bulk, scale and mass of the proposed structure, together with its residential character and appearance, would introduce a development that is out of character with the existing rear garden environment and give rise to the creation of an entirely self-contained unit not considered incidental to the main house, which would result in material harm to neighbouring residential amenity contrary to the Supplementary Planning Document for Residential Extensions and Alterations and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | The development would, by reason of its positioning removes any pedestrian visibility to No.2 Hampshire Drive which would pose a safety issue for all highway users contrary to the aims and objectives of the Policies 6.11, 6.12 and 6.13 of The London Plan and Policy DC32 of the Havering LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £940. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Brandon by e-mail on the 18/05/17 as was unable to contact him by phone. |
