| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed layout of the development, including limited frontages for the dwellings in plots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 15 and the provision of tandem parking, would be inadequate, impractical, contrived and unduly cramped and would result in a poor quality living environment for future residents through loss of privacy, undue overlooking, poor pedestrian and highway accessibility and failure to adhere to designing out crime principles. As a result, the development represents an overdevelopment of the site and would be a harmful development to local character and occupier amenity, contrary to Policies DC2, DC3, DC4 and DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, Policy 3.5 of the London Plan (as amended) and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 2. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC6, DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD, Policy 8.2 of the London Plan and Policy 6.2 of the Draft Local Plan. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | In the absence of sufficient information to demonstrate that the proposal adequately responds to policies relating to affordable housing provision, it is considered that the proposal is contrary to the provisions of Policies 3.11 and 3.13 of the London Plan, as well as the Mayor's Home for Londoner's Affordable Housing and Viability Supplementary Planning Guidance 2017, as well as the provisions of Policy 6.2 of the draft Local Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to A9 Architecture on the telephone on 22nd February 2018. |
