| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to London Plan (2016) policies 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6, the Draft London Plan ("Intend to Publish" version December 2019) policies D4 and D8, and Havering Core Strategy 2008 policies CP17 and DC61, the Emerson Park Policy Area SPD and the Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011. |
| 2. | The proposed extension would, by reason of its excessive depth, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers contrary to Havering Core Strategy 2008 policy DC61. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent prior to the decision being issued. |
