| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed extension would, by reason of its excessive bulk, depth, height and position close to the boundary, form an intrusive and unneighbourly development resulting an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed extension would, by reason of its unsympathetic design, scale, bulk and massing, and close proximity to the boundary, appear as an unacceptably dominant and incongruous feature in the rear garden setting, which would be harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Emerson Park Policy Area SPD. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for was given to the agent by email on the 2/3/17. |
