| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed roof extension by reason of its scale, bulk and mass would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature within the street scene and rear garden environment to the detriment of the character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the locality, contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document, policies D1, D3 and D4 of The London Plan (2021) and Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed roof extension by reason of its depth, height, bulk and proximity to the shared boundary, would form a dominant and visually intrusive feature having an overbearing impact to the detriment of the amenity enjoyed by the occupiers at no.6, resulting in an increased sense of enclosure and loss of outlook to this occupier contrary to the Supplementary Design Guidance (Residential Extensions and Alterations) and Policy 7 of the Local Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
