| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal would not be permitted development as the cumulative depth of the existing two storey rear extension and the proposal would be in excess of the 8m permissible by Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended). |
| 2. | By reason of its depth, height, siting to the rear of an existing extension and elevated position relative to the occupiers of no. 65 Deyncourt Gardens, the Council consider that the proposed development would have an harmful and overbearing impact upon the residential amenity of those occupiers. |
| 3. | The applicant should note that the previous application Y0006.17 which defaulted to Prior Approval Not Being Required, cannot be implemented. As with this application, the cumulative depth of the existing two storey rear extension and the extension proposed by that application would be in excess of the 8m permitted by Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended). The applicant is advised that a Certificate of Lawfulness would have been declined for Y0006.17 had one been submitted. |
